For Web Applications That Deploy Frequently
GitFlow is overkill for many modern web applications where you deploy to production several times a day. Managing five branch types when your "release cycle" is measured in hours creates friction without adding value.
GitHub Flow is a vastly simpler strategy designed for continuous delivery. It was popularized by GitHub itself and is the default mental model for most SaaS teams today.
The complete ruleset — only six steps:
- Anything in the
mainbranch is deployable. It must always be stable and production-ready. - To work on anything — a feature, a bug fix, a documentation update — create a descriptively named branch off
main(e.g.,feature/login-page,fix/null-pointer-checkout). - Commit your changes to that branch locally and push regularly to the remote server. This serves as both a backup and a progress signal to your team.
- When you want feedback, are stuck, or believe the work is complete, open a Pull Request (PR). A PR is a formal request to merge your branch into
main, and it's the primary venue for code review. - Once the PR is reviewed, approved, and passes automated checks (tests, linting, security scans), merge it into
main. - Deploy immediately after merging. Ideally, this is automated by your CI/CD pipeline.
There is no develop branch. There is no release branch. There is only main and short-lived feature branches. The simplicity is the point.
The implicit requirement: GitHub Flow only works if your main branch is protected by automated tests. If merging a PR can break production, the model collapses. You need a CI pipeline that runs your test suite on every PR before it can be merged. This is non-negotiable.